Search for: All records

Identifiability of a mathematical model plays a crucial role in the parameterization of the model. In this study, we established the structural identifiability of a susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) model given different combinations of input data and investigated practical identifiability with respect to different observable data, data frequency, and noise distributions. The practical identifiability was explored by both Monte Carlo simulations and a correlation matrix approach. Our results showed that practical identifiability benefits from higher data frequency and data from the peak of an outbreak. The incidence data gave the best practical identifiability results compared to prevalence and cumulative data. In addition, we compared and distinguished the practical identifiability by Monte Carlo simulations and a correlation matrix approach, providing insights into when to use which method for other applications. 

This paper revisits the parametric analysis of semidefinite optimization problems with respect to the perturbation of the objective function along a fixed direction. We review the notions of invariancy set, nonlinearity interval, and transition point of the optimal partition, and we investigate their characterizations. We show that the set of transition points is finite and the continuity of the optimal set mapping, on the basis of Painlevé–Kuratowski set convergence, might fail on a nonlinearity interval. Under a local nonsingularity condition, we then develop a methodology, stemming from numerical algebraic geometry, to efficiently compute nonlinearity intervals and transition points of the optimal partition. Finally, we support the theoretical results by applying our procedure to some numerical examples. 

Stragglers, Byzantine workers, and data privacy are the main bottlenecks in distributed cloud computing. Some prior works proposed coded computing strategies to jointly address all three challenges. They require either a large number of workers, a significant communication cost or a significant computational complexity to tolerate Byzantine workers. Much of the overhead in prior schemes comes from the fact that they tightly couple coding for all three problems into a single framework. In this paper, we propose Adaptive Verifiable Coded Computing (AVCC) framework that decouples the Byzantine node detection challenge from the straggler tolerance. AVCC leverages coded computing just for handling stragglers and privacy, and then uses an orthogonal approach that leverages verifiable computing to mitigate Byzantine workers. Furthermore, AVCC dynamically adapts its coding scheme to trade-off straggler tolerance with Byzantine protection. We evaluate AVCC on a compute-intensive distributed logistic regression application. Our experiments show that AVCC achieves up to 4.2× speedup and up to 5.1% accuracy improvement over the state-of-the-art Lagrange coded computing approach (LCC). AVCC also speeds up the conventional uncoded implementation of distributed logistic regression by up to 7.6×, and improves the test accuracy by up to 12.1%.